Ego Strength Assessment Tool for Psychedelic Preparation

Understanding Ego Strength in Psychedelic Work

Ego strength is crucial for anyone navigating the complexities of inner conflict, external stress, and emotional intensity. In Jungian psychology, the ego is not something to eradicate. Instead, it serves as the conscious center of identity, balancing our unconscious thoughts, physical body, and the surrounding world. A strong ego promotes flexibility, self-reflection, reality testing, and the integration of diverse experiences.

In various New Age and psychedelic communities, the term "ego" often gets misunderstood. It is sometimes equated with arrogance or grandiosity, character traits that reflect an inflated ego state. This misunderstanding can lead to the flawed belief that dissolving the ego is always healing. Conversely, a weak or fragmented ego can leave individuals vulnerable to emotional dysregulation, depersonalization, or even psychosis.

When working with psychedelics, the strength of one's ego becomes vital. These substances frequently disrupt conventional boundaries of self, bringing forth deep unconscious material. Insufficient ego development might lead to emotional flooding or long-term destabilization. By assessing ego strength, facilitators can ensure clients possess the internal stability and self-awareness necessary to navigate chaotic, transpersonal experiences safely.

Research Supporting Ego Strength Assessment

Research underscores the necessity of ego strength assessment. A recent study highlights the following findings: (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-024-02800-5):

• The lifetime incidence of psychedelic-induced psychosis is approximately 0.002% in the general population, but around 0.6% in clinical trials.

• Among individuals with a history of schizophrenia, up to 3.8% may develop prolonged psychosis.

• Of these cases, 13.1% subsequently develop schizophrenia.

  
  

While I hold great respect for Dr. Richards and other leaders in clinical trials, these statistics demonstrate that adverse events still occur, even in controlled environments, and at rates higher than in the general population.

There are multiple interpretations of this data:

• Smaller sample sizes in clinical trials may inflate incidence rates.

• Clinical oversight is often tighter, catching symptoms that might go unnoticed in broader population studies.

• Many trials recruit individuals with pre-existing mental health conditions, heightening vulnerability and suggesting currently used screening protocols may be inadequate.

  
  

My research aims to deepen the understanding of this phenomenon to improve risk assessment and best practices in the future.

The Current State of Clinical Trials

Despite my admiration for pioneers like Dr. Richards, I believe the clinical trials, particularly those using a rigid medical model, often lack effectiveness and ethics. My concern is that some programs, like those at Hopkins, may falter under regulatory scrutiny. The hesitancy shown by the FDA regarding MDMA suggests that caution can sometimes be justified.

However, criminalization is not the solution. This situation underscores the urgent need for legalization and decriminalization, accompanied by education, harm reduction, and ethical frameworks. People possess the right to explore their consciousness, even if it involves personal risk. Supporting human agency through informed consent and harm reduction is crucial in this psychedelic renaissance. Individuals must be aware of the inherent risks. The pervasive notion that "there are no bad trips" can undermine our foundations.

Understanding Psychedelics and Mental Health

We are still at the forefront of understanding how psychedelics interact with mental health. Those using psychedelics for therapeutic reasons are often self-experimenters, navigating unpredictable terrain without ample guidance. No single protocol fits all conditions, nor will there be a universal approach any time soon.

What Happens if Someone "Fails" the Assessment?

If clients do not perform well on the ego strength assessment, it raises critical questions. What if someone has already exhausted traditional medical routes yet remains stuck after taking this assessment? If they fall into the "defer" category, what are their options?

While higher doses of psychedelics may not be advisable right away, this doesn't signify a dead end. This result may imply that what they truly need is deep preparation. Techniques that emphasize subtle, somatic, and soulful practices may be more beneficial. Consider modalities like vipassana meditation, Somatic Experiencing, or microdosing under a Fadiman-style protocol. If conventional talk therapy seems exhausted, collaborating with a trained and ethical coach who practices integrative approaches can facilitate healing. It is essential to explore active imagination and rebuild trust with the unconscious. Remember, psychedelics can act as one of many portals for growth.

Sources Supporting Assessment Metrics

Several academic sources validate metrics for psycho-emotional assessments, emphasizing the importance of ego strength:

1. Aday, J. S. et al. (2020). Long-term effects of psychedelic drugs: A systematic review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 113, 179–189. Link

2. Bremler, R. et al. (2023). Case analysis of long-term negative psychological responses to psychedelics. Scientific Reports, 13, 15998. Link

3. Elfrink, S., & Bergin, L. (2025). Psychedelic iatrogenic structural dissociation: An exploratory hypothesis on dissociative risks in psychedelic use. Frontiers in Psychology, 16. Link

4. Frecska, E. (2007). Therapeutic guidelines: Dangers and contra-indications in therapeutic applications of hallucinogens. Link

5. Johnson, M. W. et al. (2019). Classic psychedelics: An integrative review. Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 197, 83–102. Link

6. Krediet, E. et al. (2020). Reviewing the potential of psychedelics for the treatment of PTSD. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, 23(6), 385–400. Link

7. Sabé, M. et al. (2025). Reconsidering evidence for psychedelic-induced psychosis. Molecular Psychiatry, 30, 1223–1255. Link

8. Yildirim, B. et al. (2024). Adverse psychiatric effects of psychedelic drugs: A systematic review of case reports. Psychological Medicine, 54(15), 1–13. Link

   
   

The Assessment Tool

This non-clinical assessment helps psychedelic facilitators evaluate a client's ego strength across key psychological domains. Each domain includes reflection questions that clients should answer honestly. Facilitators can use a scoring guide to interpret the responses.

Section 1: Self-Reflection (Client-Completed)

Clients rate each statement using the scale: 0 = Never, 1 = Rarely, 2 = Sometimes, 3 = Often, 4 = Always.

• I can remain calm even when I’m deeply upset.

• I can differentiate between my emotions and objective reality.

• I’m open to feedback, even when it challenges me.

• I have bounced back from emotional setbacks before.

• I know who I am, even when things fall apart.

• I can sit with painful or confusing thoughts without escaping.

• I reflect on my choices and grow from them.

• I seek help when I need support.

• I trust myself to make good decisions.

  
  

Total Score: Add all items (maximum = 36).

Interpretation:

• Green Zone: 28–36 – Likely ready

• Yellow Zone: 18–27 – Recommend preparation

• Red Zone: <18 – Defer psychedelic work

  
  

Section 2: Open-Ended Prompts

Facilitators can ask one or more questions below and listen for insights that indicate readiness:

Resilience

• Can you share a challenge you faced and how you coped?

• What helps you get back up when life knocks you down?

  
  

Adaptability

• How do you respond to sudden changes or uncertainty?

• Can you describe a moment when things didn’t go as planned, and how you adapted?

  
  

Coping & Emotional Regulation

• What do you typically do when feeling overwhelmed, anxious, or angry?

• How do you care for yourself during difficult emotional states?

  
  

Self-Efficacy

• Can you recall a time you believed in yourself, despite doubts?

• How do you tackle intimidating or unclear goals?

  
  

Relationships & Support Systems

• Who do you rely on when struggling, and what do those relationships feel like?

• Have you received support that helped you through hard times?

  
  

Problem-Solving Capacity

• How do you address complex problems or decisions?

• What steps do you take in choosing between two difficult options?

  
  

Purpose & Meaning

• What provides direction or purpose in your life right now?

• When facing challenges, which values guide you?

  
  

Self-Reflection & Insight

• How do you reflect on past painful or confusing experiences?

• What insights have you gained about yourself in recent years?

  
  

Gratitude & Emotional Resourcefulness

• What are you grateful for, even in struggles?

• Can you think of a time when expressing gratitude changed your emotional state?

  
  

Sense of Achievement & Integration

• Describe an accomplishment you are proud of. Why is it significant to you?

• How do you acknowledge your growth and progress?

  
  

Look for themes of resilience, self-awareness, support systems, and realistic expectations.

Scoring Guide

Once you review the client’s responses, rate each domain from 1 to 5:

1 – Severely underdeveloped

2 – Limited capacity, inconsistent insight

3 – Moderate development, functional typically

4 – Well-developed, stable, resourceful

5 – Highly developed, reflective, integrated

Total possible score: 50

Interpretation:

• 40–50: Strong ego structure, high readiness

• 30–39: Moderately strong, some support recommended

• 20–29: Needs preparatory work before high-dose use

• Below 20: High risk, consider deferring psychedelic work

  
  

Section 3: Facilitator Observations (Post-Conversation)

Rate each trait from 1 (Low) to 5 (High), based on interaction with the client:

• Emotional regulation:

• Insight into behavior:

• Resilience in challenges:

• Openness to feedback:

• Grounded presence:

• Reality testing ability:

• Flexibility:

• Sense of purpose:

• Strength of social support system:

  
  

Scoring Guide: Total possible score: 45 (9 items x max score of 5)

Interpretation:

• Green Zone (36–45): High overall ego strength and readiness for psychedelic work.

• Yellow Zone (24–35): Moderate ego strength; some traits may require support.

• Red Zone (Below 24): Low ego strength; recommend deferral and more preparation.

  
  

Final Summary: Synthesizing Scores and Intuition

The Ego Strength Assessment Tool helps facilitators evaluate clients’ psychological readiness for psychedelic experiences. It does not replace human judgment. Numeric scores offer a helpful framework. However, they must always be considered in the context of clients’ lived experiences and the facilitator’s intuitive insights.

Let’s say a client scores as follows:

• Section 1 (Client Self-Reflection): 40 – High self-reported resilience and insight

• Section 2 (Facilitator Interview Scoring): 35 – Moderately strong responses with areas for reflection

• Section 3 (Facilitator Observations): 32 – Functional structure with some developing traits

  
  

These scores suggest a client with good ego strength, likely capable of navigating a psychedelic experience with appropriate preparation. Nevertheless, numeric data alone cannot fully capture nuances, risks, or subtle warning signs. This is where the facilitator’s presence and intuition are crucial.

Critical Questions for Facilitators

Ask yourself:

• Did I feel safe and grounded during our interaction?

• Is the client willing and able to confront difficult material without avoidance?

• Do they demonstrate humility, openness, and eagerness to learn?

• Is there a strong enough anchor in their psyche to navigate expanded states of consciousness?

  
  

Facilitators should trust their inner compass—the quiet understanding that arises from deep listening and compassion. Psychedelic facilitation is relational, intuitive, and energetic rather than strictly technical. Sometimes a high score doesn't equate to readiness, and a lower score doesn’t mean "no". Instead, readiness exists within a total field—a balance of data, dialogue, and direct experience.

Ultimately, this tool aims to empower you to make informed, embodied, and ethical choices for the sake of client safety and transformation.

Disclaimers: This is an original piece written by Holly Flammer but utilizes AI editing tools for polishing the work.

The content on this website and all coaching services provided by Holly Flammer are for educational and informational purposes only. They are not intended to substitute professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment from a licensed healthcare provider.

As a coach, Holly Flammer is not a medical doctor, psychiatrist, psychologist, therapist, or other licensed healthcare professional. We do not diagnose, treat, prevent, or cure any medical, mental, emotional, or physical conditions. Always seek the advice of your physician or another qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition or mental health concern. Do not disregard professional medical advice or delay seeking it because of something you have read on this website or during a coaching session. If you have a medical emergency, call your doctor or 911 immediately.

Personal Responsibility

You acknowledge that you are voluntarily participating in using this blog and coaching services. You are solely and personally responsible for your choices, actions, and results. You accept full responsibility for the consequences of your use or non-use of any information provided on or through this website and coaching services. You agree to use your judgment and due diligence before implementing any idea, suggestion, or recommendation provided.

Constitutional Protections

The information and perspectives shared here are intended as expressions of free speech. We believe in the open exchange of ideas, and our content is offered with the understanding that such expressions are protected under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. Furthermore, we operate under the principles of individual liberty and due process, as outlined in the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. However, these protections do not alter the non-medical nature of our services or negate the need for professional medical advice.

No Guarantees

We cannot guarantee any specific outcome or result from using this website or coaching services. Your success primarily depends on your effort, motivation, commitment, and numerous other factors beyond our control. By using this website and engaging in coaching services, you agree to this Disclaimer.

Last Updated: June 26, 2025